Ui browser vs
It supports most Web Browsers and OS but it cannot be used for Desktop testing. It has progressively become the industry standard since then because of its flexibility to be used on several third-party IDEs and using some of the most popular modern programing languages. Selenium has been around since 2004 but I cannot find it as being a challenger to UFT until 2008-2010. It is possible now but still it's not a straight forward process. It was not originally designed for remote or multiple parallel execution.Based on old-technology: VBScript which is a non-OOP language.Limited browser and browser versions support.Its cost-model based on protocols and frequent renewals makes its licenses much more expensive compared to every other offering. UFT does well things like object repository, script recording and playback and reports.It covers some niches that others don't such as image-based scripting for Citrix protocol testing.For more complex needs, you will need to script using VBScript. For simple test cases, it is the easier to learn and use even without programming skills because of its Keyword view.Integrates with Quality Center for test/bug management and it's part of HP/Micro-focus ALM tool stack.
![ui browser vs ui browser vs](https://xn--90abhccf7b.xn--p1ai/800/600/https/overcoder.net/img/1/13/36/123544.png)
Easy to install, it's all in one package: IDE, test runner, Reporting, integration, etc.Its add-in protocols do speed up automation of commonly used Enterprise Management software.It does reporting much better that any other competitors.It has been around for long time, it's the most mature offering.UFT uses VBScript as it's scripting language, it supports Web and Desktop and has protocols that ease scripting of some CRM/ERP applications like SAP and Oracle. However it has lost its leader position to Selenium in the last years. Therefore it's called Micro-Focus UFT now and is still one of the most used tools.
#Ui browser vs software
Mercury was acquired by HP in 2006 and later HP sold its software division to Micro Focus in 2016.
#Ui browser vs professional
Quick Test Professional (QTP) now called United Functional Testing (UFT) was originally created by Mercury Interactive in the 90s and it became the de facto industry standard back then.
![ui browser vs ui browser vs](https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*Kw8Id2np1U58_dOQEun92g.png)
The list of below shows the most common UI Automation tools used for Functional Testing Automation and Regression testing (no particular order), their descriptions, features, pros and cos: I will list the most common and popular test tools, what features makes them popular and their limitations. If you are a QA automation newcomer the goal of this guide would be to provide guidance in finding a good tool that matches your testing needs. Whichever is the reason, if you are an experienced professional you may benefit from having a bigger picture of what is out there on the Enterprise-level software test tool market.
![ui browser vs ui browser vs](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/dQEAAOSwPCZbpM8c/s-l400.jpg)
Are you a Software Test Professional? If so, what test tool do you use? As most of people when they start in QA, you may have to become proficient with only one or two test tools because you are restricted to what is being used in your company, or what was best to test a specific application or perhaps because it aligned better with your teams' ALM tool stack.